Spring of women veiled in revolutions

By Asmaa Fathy

Before the 2011 revolutions, I have never seen a good portrayal of Muslim women in media.

The women covered by the media usually played into the stereotypes of Muslim women as weak, silent, and victimized, and the only discussion about Muslim women that ever got any airtime was about their clothing.

Many so-called experts, media gurus, and politicians obsessed over head-scarves (hijabs), face veils (niqabs), and cloaks (burkhas), clearly believing that Muslim women were somehow defined by their clothing choices.

But When the media images of women from Egypt, Tunisia, and Yemen began rolling in, I was thrilled.

Here were women who were neither submissive nor silent, and their clothing appeared to pose no barriers to their participation in the demonstrations.

There were pictures of young girls with hijabs tucked around animated faces, arms raised high and fingers split in the universal signs for victory and peace.

There were images of women in niqab bowing down in prayer shoulder-to-shoulder with men, in front of tanks and barricades and screaming revolutionary slogans in Arabic and English. In fact, some of the key leaders in the protests were women wearing hijabs.

In Yemen, Tawakul Abdel-Salam Karman, a fiery female activist managed to lead the protests while wearing a hijab and black burkha. many egyptains women whom is credited with a significant role in igniting and then leading the revolution in Egypt, wore a hijab

Bahrain: The girl has a mini skirt….and isn’t afraid to use it.

Source of photo: www.supre.com.au

My plane landed around 9PM on Saturday, 24 July 2010.  I had been flying/sitting in an airport for almost 24 anxious hours.  After having traveled for so long, all I wanted to see was the person who got me into this world-traveling mess: my boyfriend, Capt America.  Now, Capt America really is a Captain, but not for the Avengers, rather for the US Air Force and he had been stationed at the Naval Base in Al Manama, Bahrain.  I told him I was adventurous and wanted to have an adventure…..I was in for a surprise.

Squatting
When we found out we were moving to Bahrain, we did our homework, or so we thought.  We learned Bahrain was a tourist country; they were progressive Muslims; they liked their alcohol (but only at hotels); I would be able to wield by mini skirts; they spoke English.  I was sold.  My first rude awakening came after being reunited with my love; I had to pee.  Navigating into a confusing bathroom, I was confronted with a hole in the ground.  Was there a mistake?  I wasn’t supposed to go to the bathroom in that, was I?  I checked the other stalls, much to the amusement of a snickering 8yr old girl in there with me. Yes.  They really did expect me to squat.  After having mastered that event, I felt like I was already an Arabic world professional.  Turns out, most bathrooms aren’t truly like that here in Bahrain.  I think they put those squatters there just to weed out the weak.

It’s getting hot in here……..

Before I left everyone said, I hope you sure do like it hot.  Yes, I realized that it would be hot, but I didn’t know just how hot it really would be.  Arriving to Bahrain late at night, I didn’t realize just how hot it would feel.  At 9PM it was 99 degrees with about 80% humidity.  Good thing I’m not really big on makeup or we would have a serious problem.  For the next week, the low would be around 100, highs edging dangerously close to 120.  Although we Georgians pride ourselves for being able to withstand incredible heat waves, I was not prepared for that.  As I unpacked my suitcase, I left my bathing suits in their little bag: All my visions of laying out on our roof top deck were quickly squashed with the oppressive wall of heat that I was encountered with once I opened the door.

Posted by Bahraini Blogger

My Beloved BB

 

 “ Benazir loved suits, skirts, saris, gowns and jeans.  Seeing Benazir in a skirt reminded me of her times at Oxford, Surrey, Dubai and all those times when we spent together,” says Stephen Bubb,  CEO of ACEVO recalling his times with Benazir Bhutto during the 70′s adding that her death took a part of him forever….

By Stephen Bubb

At a dinner party this fall I had been told by colleagues that the ICFJ had sponsored a project for intercultural cultural harmony under the auspices of the UN. I am not very fond of the UN but when my assistant Marie Alison mentioned that Benazir Bhutto had been covered in that project I couldn’t help but have a look.

Since that dreadful winter day in Dec 2007, when she was assassinated, I had secluded and resigned a part of myself which was ever in touch with Benazir. The ICFJ article broke that seclusion and brought back a flood of memories.

Suddenly I was back under the cherry tree in Oxford locking lips with Benazir. She seemed to travel through sands of time, bringing back emotions that I thought were buried for ever.

Seeing Benazir in a skirt reminded me of her times at Oxford, Surrey, Dubai and all those times when we traveled to various Mediterranean resorts.

On meeting Benazir Bhutto, for first time in the fall of 1973, we had a fight over a debating issue. The second time even a worse fight, the third time we fell for each other perhaps finding no alternative. We were a good team for a while, before I moved on to other subjects and she opted for political science and foreign relations as her majors.  But beyond the debating society we stayed on together. We had a very close knit circle of friends.

She called me Bubbly and I called her Pinky.

Benazir was the most exotic girl on campus with her wild ways and penchant for lively discussions late into the night. She would cheer any one no matter what the mood and how down cast one would be.  We used to think of her as the delectable and glamorous jewel of Lady Margaret Hall.

When I lost the LC chair for the first time Pinky came to my college dorm with friends and champagne. She lifted my spirits and all the gloom of the day vanished during that night.

We would listen to Gainsbourg’s  J e t’aime moi non plus while sipping on glasses of R&B. Both were a favorite of Pinky and mine. Benazir would take me on trips to Stratford for watching plays at the Royal Shakespeare Company in her yellow sports car. She lived fast and drove fast. She would brighten the dance floor at the central oxford club, our favorite hang out spot.

She had developed a liking for roman sandals and short skirts by the time she came to Oxford from Harvard. There she was in hot pants sitting across me at the editor’s office and I was just thinking that this is really one attractive girl. Afterwards I found that she had the intellect and intelligence to match her beauty.

Once we celebrated national-dress day and every student appeared in their respective national dress. Benazir wore a sari (oriental suit) and looked like an angel had descended on earth.

At Oxford she would arrange the best parties and took pains to make sure everyone was involved or at least felt involved.

We would romp around campus canvassing for the society elections. Our friendship blossomed with time. Next summer the blokes played a prank and asked the losing team on the council if we would live up to our claims of an egalitarian society free of religious and cultural restraints. It was June and Benazir’s birthday was around the corner. She played their bluff and appeared at the party in her birthday suit. Everyone was stunned by her bold move and it shut up the dissenting chaps.

Six months later Benazir was elected President of the Oxford Union. The first ever by any Asian at that time.
Pinky was Pinky and she dressed her mood. The 70’s was a casual era, we were more concerned about being hip than fashionable. I remember seeing Benazir Bhutto attending classes mostly in Jeans. During the winter she would opt for the most expensive dresses. In summer she would opt for stylish suits to go with the family outing on the Brighton beach.

One time Ms. Asfahani Bhutto, the mom of Benazir, visited and Pinky decided to have a picnic at Brighton. We went to Harrods and she purchased swimming costumes for herself, her mom and brother Mr. Murtaza.

I still remember our last summer of 1976 when we went to Cap d’Agde. There was an anxious tone in the air; it felt like we were gathering for the last time. Perhaps it was the graduation season, or it was because Pinky said she was returning back home or perhaps it was some kind of prenomination. The amorous French air dulled our anxieties. Little did we know that life for Pinky, would change for ever after her return to Pakistan. 

In the summer of 1977 her father was illegally deposed. I had met Mr. Bhutto when he had come to visit. He was a very charismatic person and would brighten up the room with his candor. Afterwards for the very few and rare occasions when I saw Benazir happy, the humor and wit of Mr. Bhutto reflected in her.

The mid seventies was a golden time for us.

We didn’t have a care in the world.

Benazir returned to Pakistan.

I kissed her good bye.

She told me:

“ Bubbly I’ll be back next summer and we’ll go to Cap d’Agde again.”

I felt a sting in my heart, but I never imagined in my wildest dreams that I would see Pinkie again after eight long years, instead of the next summer.
 
History then witnessed an elected representative and popular leader judicially murdered by a brutal military dictator. Pinky, against wise counsel decided to stay back and resist the military junta. She was first put under house arrest and then sent to a notorious army jail. I couldn’t even go and help her in Pakistan.

I lost contact with her.

The regime had placed travel restrictions on Benazir’s acquaintances in UK. I felt so guilty for not stopping her when I could have. I didn’t try to stop her earlier. I knew I couldn’t have stopped her even if I wanted to.
After her confinement of three years, I saw her photo in the newspaper which reported on Benazir’s illness. We were all horrified to see Pinky reduced to a shadow of her former self. She was almost a skeleton. We couldn’t believe the military regime would be so brutal. Her brothers had already gone into exile and had started a resistance organization Al-Zulfiqar which unfortunately turned militant afterwards.

 In 1984, under international pressure, Benazir was released although reluctantly by the military junta. She traveled to Switzerland and then to UK where she had to under go medical treatment for all the physical and mental suffering afflicted upon her by a cruel regime. I didn’t have the heart to see her the first week but managed to go and finally see her in the following week.

I went with Vijay Selvaratnam,our close mutual friend. She cried on seeing Benazir. I had to struggle in keeping a straight face.  Benazir saw me, smiled and said “” Oh Bubbly, I missed you,”  she made some jovial comment and I could only say Hi. Her spirit was as strong as before perhaps even stronger. The junta had failed to break her will.

Reporters asked her if she had gone into exile. Benazir said that she was born in Pakistan and would die in Pakistan.Tragically this statement would become true 23 years later. 

She quickly became active in organizing political opposition to the military rule and this is where her true competencies as a maverick agitator were revealed. Pinky was back in action only this time instead of protesting against University authorities, the opposition was real and a frightingly murderous military dictatorship.

Benazir changed after her return to UK. She had developed an iron determination. Whenever she smiled one could see the wounded emotions behind it. She felt anger at the regime and the judiciary which had conspired together in falsely convicting her father. She felt let down by the people who had allowed a popular leader to be hanged. Her focus was razor sharp and all her activities were now centered around exposing the military regime’s ugly face to the world. I tried to bring her back to normalcy, and we arranged a get together party in the fall of 1985 at a Rolling Stones concert.

Captain Eddington used to be our mentor in those days and suggested that we give Pinky a gift on her birthday that summer. Benazir was very fond of rolling stone and the Chippendales’ boys. So we bought her tickets to the Chippendales show.  She was slowly coming back to her original self and I was happy to see her enjoying her life again. We would visit the French Cannes spending hours hand in hand straddling the beach.
 
Benazir had become increasingly silent and then tragedy after tragedy struck. The military junta in Pakistan had used the Afghan war to befriend the US government. Her US contacts who had initially promised support for her struggle had become mild spectators as the dictatorship in Pakistan gave US a chance to avenge the Vietnam war from USSR.
It was such an irony. Pinky had told me that during her stay in USA she was part of the anti-war protests while the Vietnam war was raging. And now the very friends she had trusted left her in the lurch. Unfortunately that was not the last time the Americans would betray her.

By early 1986 she had decided to return back to Pakistan. I asked Pinky to rethink, but she had decided that her destiny was back home and it was now her time to find it. 

This time I really tried to stop her, but she was very stubborn and had her eyes fixed upon returning back to Pakistan. 

We kissed goodbye again, one year later I heard she was getting engaged and subsequently married to a person selected by her mother. I was shell shocked. It was so unlike Pinky. I never believed it until I saw it on BBC.
 

Another year passed and she was the Prime Minister of a country 150 Million strong. It seemed she had achieved her dream and conquered her destiny. 

I met her again in 1989 when she visited UK on an official trip as head of state. I was so proud of her. We were sitting at the Banquet Hall. She had returned after meeting Margaret Thatcher and was now talking about her trip to the US.
 

Benazir had become accustomed to wearing formal dress suits as part of her official status.She seemed so royal and different than her days in UK. She would tag along her husband every now and then, and because of him (current president of Pakistan) we would have to keep our distance and discretely call her Prime Minister.

 

Politics kept us apart, but only physically.

We would talk once in a while over the phone, however, those conversations were rare and far in between.
Due to the internal politics in Pakistan, phones at the Prime Minister house were being bugged at that time.
The early 90s was a tumultuous time and Benazir would either be leader of the house or leader of the opposition. 
Like her Oxford days she played a leading role in both capacities.

By 1997 under an increasingly hostile establishment she was again betrayed by a person who was opted as President by her. She told me that her own President had colluded to bring down her Government. Pinky had had enough of this and in view of threats she and her children faced, decided for self exile in 1998.

A blessing in disguise was that now we were able to meet after a long time. 

We met again in 1998, and I felt a repeat of her struggle in the 80’s. This time she had the additional burden of fighting for a person who had been brought into her life as a husband.

While sunbathing on the deck of the carnival cruise liner Jubilee, Benazir once told me, how she wished that life back in Pakistan could be filled again with sunshine and joy. She always seemed to be thinking of her country and believed that her life and destiny were entwined with that of her mother land.  

Benazir was now shuttling between UK, USA and UAE trying to mobilize her party and keeping it intact.While holding the highest executive post in her country, a persona had developed around and about her.

In a country with fundamentalist streaks and religious dogma still strong, Benazir would be seen addressing political rallies with her chador (long dress and covering like a burka).

Politics of religion and conservatism combined to portray her as daughter of the east. It was a patronizing and condescending title which annoyed me when she didn’t take exception to it. In UK I used to meet her at Surrey where she would arrange parties for a circle of people close to her. After one such party I jokingly asked Benazir how she felt being daughter of the east. Wearing a short white dress she replied with a smirk that she was above titles and accolades. I knew better to argue with her.   

Benazir loved her suits, skirts, saris, gowns and jeans.

Now that she was in the west, paradoxically she found it liberating, like old times at Oxford. Benazir was hardly recognized when she accompanied me to the theater or opera wearing party dresses and gowns. Happy times seemed to have lurked back in her life.

Once, Benazir took me to watch the performance of Ursula Martinez, one of her favorite artists. At the gala dinner that followed, I introduced her as my dance partner. No one recognized Benazir and people kept complimenting her looks. We laughed so much afterwards and she reminded me of the giggling girl back in Oxford. 

By 2006 her plans to return and end her exile had gained momentum.Before she left for her country again we went to Loch Shiel.Benazir and I strolled the Scottish water front while I kept asking her to stall her plans of return but she was adamant. Our brief argument yielded to silence and we never spoke a word during that long walk. It was as if we knew that the time had finally come.

I remember she smiled, told me to cheer up and lose the long face, gave me a kiss and said, “Bubbly you know I always come back”.

How I wish that was true.

Benazir was a world citizen not confined to a single ethos. She embodied a true facade of being multi- cultural, tolerant and a laissez-faire liberalism.

 Thank you, Hijabskirt for reminding the world about this.

To live in the hearts we leave behind is to never die.

After Benazir our planet is a much poorer place now

The Unholy Trinity

BY SHERRY REHMAN

Sherry Rehman is former Federal Minister of Information of Pakistan (2008-2009), Member of National Assembly PPP and close friend of  Benazir Bhuto

Hijabskirt might sound like a misnomer, however, this project entails the efforts to put together different ends of a cultural spectrum. This spectrum comes from a common source, a shared vision of a common humanity facing common problems and issues.

How a woman should appear and how not to appear in her own life?

Shouldn’t this be left at her own free discretion?

I use the word “free discretion” since this formulation about ones own life should be done without any undercurrents of imposed perceptions. (The unholy trinity).

Whether a woman dons the hijab or miniskirt, that personal choice should be an absolutely free choice. It would be an injustice of monumental proportions if half of humanity is deprived of this right by subjecting them to fears, of being judged upon their appearances.

Unfortunately, both east and west are guilty of this.

How the western media howls when Angela Merkel appeared at the Oslo Opera in a Victorian designer dress or when Michelle Obama decides to dress a bit more casually. How the online Pakistani forums shot a fuse when Benazir was revealed to wear skirts and western clothing of her choice privately. What is common in all of those hyperventilating media reactions, is the self arrogated custodians of culture, religion and morals, who think they have the right to pass judgment on women, who have done nothing but exercised their personal choices. 

Benazire Bhutto was my close friend. My beloved Bibi. She used to say that the best hijab is in the eyes of the beholder. Fully considerate about the conservative background of her country, culture and religion she had chosen to eschew the lifestyle of the west and return back to serve the nation as an emblem of her people and truly proved that she was indeed the daughter of the east.

Hijab with Benazir was a way for displaying her respect and admiration for the cultural heritage of our land.

When it came to dress and fashion sense she was unparalleled and was proclaimed as one of the top 50 best looking person in the world. Privately she was partial to a modern and comfortable dress style that well suited her down to earth personality.

Benazir believed that one’s choice of dress in their own lives, was purely a private matter. Having said that her choice of fashion and clothing left a lot of admirers even in the snobbish cliché high society of Dubai.

While in exile Benazir used to wear comfortable jeans during her residence at UK. I still remember when it was reported with ghastly details in the local press how she would go shopping in Jeans, as if she had committed a high crime. A similar but toned out burst of fury was displayed when it came to public view that bibi preferred equally comfortable skirts or dresses in the privacy of her home. Self righteousness and moral delusion was seen at it’s worst at this time.

Sasha asked me how a beautiful and youthful Benazir within the span of a few years had aged so much. I would say the burden of her upcoming duty and the thought they she would have to endure it alone was enough to bring any human to that threshold. Needless to say she faced all challenges with admirable grace and fortitude.

In the end perhaps she was naïve to believe in the good nature of man.

We always hear that it’s a man’s world. A world given birth to and brought up by its women and yet it stays a “mans world”. Mankind or humankind? Changing the vernacular wouldn’t make a difference until the perceptual barriers that contain any kind of prejudice are brought down. Prejudices lead to acts of injustice and injustice leads to disharmony.

These perceptions have the potential of developing into grave consequences if they exist between civilizations and could have severe cross cultural implications.

At the risk of sounding like a feminist (which I am not), I mince no words in saying that the crux of the problem as highlighted by distinguished guests on this forum has been the control of women. Not physically but mentally controlling a woman, relegating her to a role more suited to male aspirations. The research and debate would continue among anthropologists and ethnologists as to why, when and how along the evolutionary path did the balance of power tip in favor of patriarchal systems. The bottom line is that since then women were, and still are, told to see themselves through mirrors and lenses jaundiced and jaded by male prejudices. The tools most commonly used to accomplish this are religion, culture and morals.

I call them the unholy trinity. This nature would have to change and the “unholy trinity” must face the collective judgment of humanity itself.

Prof Joanna Bourke, Birkbeck College, London

What is it about the way women dress that excites so much fury? In Johannesburg, a young woman was recently stripped, sexually assaulted and paraded naked by a group of taxi operators as punishment for wearing “indecent” clothes.

Only three years ago in Britain, an ICM poll found that one in every four women believes that a woman who wears sexy clothes is partially or totally responsible if she is subsequently raped. Evolutionary psychologists like Randy Thornhill and Craig Palmer even argue that young men ought to be made aware of the evolutionary reasons why men are aroused by the sign of female flesh and that girls ought to be taught “the costs associated with attractiveness”. We are constantly told that we live in an egalitarian, post-feminist world, but women are still seen as somehow to blame if they are sexually assaulted.

Women have not simply sat back and let themselves be dictated to about how they adorn themselves. Clothes are the new politics. In France, thousands of women marched in the streets to defend their right to wear the veil. Many of them have done this in the name of free choice, rather than slavish devotion to religious or parental exhortations. In Jerusalem, a growing number of Jewish women have taken to covering their heads in a sal. Some have even wrapped themselves head-to-toe in a gown resembling the Iranian chador or the Afghan burka. As one of the defenders of the sal admitted: “If the Jews want to conquer the Arabs in their land they must enhance their modesty.” In such a way, women’s clothing is pressed into service in the battle between Jew and Arab.

At the other extreme, women with more money than sense are having Botox and plastic surgery or paying for their little toes to be amputated (pink-ectomies) in order to fit into the latest Jimmy Choos.

With all this happening, is it any wonder that debating the politics of clothes is back in fashion? In the past women found themselves constrained by fear of dangerous spaces. They protested that walking around Soho at night was liable to elicit wolf-whistles and offers of “cash for snatch”. Today, restrictions on women’s movements have shrunk to the very garments against their skin. Even when not flaunting their flesh, women’s bodies are seen as sexual. Indeed, some rabbis criticise the wearing of the sal precisely on the ground that it actually draws attention to women.

By definition, femaleness has become pornographic. Whether making arguments for covering up women’s bodies or encouraging exuberant sexual expression in dress, these debates share a profound fear of women and their alleged voracious sexuality. Women must know their place, or pay the price. If they break the rules, they should expect a backlash.

For women even more than men, clothes have always been about identity. They signify belonging – whether to another man (a father or husband), a nation (Indian or British), a faith (Muslim or Jewish), or a cultural community (hippie or goth). In fearful times, when society is threatened by war, corruption and crumbling values, it becomes even more important to encourage or coerce women into taking up a symbolic role as upholders of morality and stability.

While these debates about clothes affect women, they reveal a concern about men. Paradoxically, it is men who are the real problem. Arguments about women’s clothing expose a profound distrust of the male sex. After all, who are scantily dressed women supposed to be corrupting, unless it is decently attired men? The problem is that men’s sex drive is aggressively needy: women need to police their outer garments because men can’t police their inner beast.

As long ago as September 1946, the British Medical Journal published a letter from a doctor suggesting that the Government consider the “compulsory veiling of women” in Britain as a solution to an epidemic of crimes of sexual violence. As he quipped, tongue in cheek: “So long as the leaders of civilisation remain unaware of how to promote self-control in the individual the Moslem solution may prove the only alternative to wholesale compulsory sterilisation of the male.”

In this country, at least, neither the knife nor compulsory veiling is likely to prove popular. But the politics of clothing remains important for those seeking equality for men and women. A couple of days ago, hundreds of women in Johannesburg marched in the street, some wearing mini-skirts and high heels, demanding that men who violently attack women for violating a respectable dress code be punished. Women’s right to wear a mini-skirt or, indeed, a burka, might not be on par with their right to the vote or to equal pay in the workplace, but without one it is difficult to see us attaining the other  ( “TIMES”)

Prof Sanaa Aly Marei Makhlouf, American University in Cairo and Al-Azhar University

By Lucy Chumbley, the editor of Washington Window, the newspaper of the Episcopal Diocese of Washington.

Asked about the role of women in Islam and why they need to cover their hair, two female panelists at a recent Christian-Muslim Summit at Washington National Cathedral – a Sunni Muslim and a Roman Catholic – said it was important to keep gender distinctions in perspective.

“We see ourselves as part of humanity and we are not used to identifying ourselves in terms of gender,” said Sanaa Aly Marei Makhlouf, professor at American University in Cairo and at the English Center of Islamic Studies at Cairo’s Al-Azhar University. “This is particularly modern and particularly Western, and it has something to do with Western history – the way women were perceived.”

“I know myself in terms of myself, not in terms of the other,” she continued, “and as a result I feel addressed by all speech that addresses humanity.”

Makhlouf said she doesn’t experience divine words in terms of her gender but in terms of “my heart, my humanity.”

“If I cover my hair it is in obedience to [my faith], it is in no way a reflection of my status in society or in no way proscribed by any male,” she said. “It is in obedience to Allah and to his Koran.”

“I always get the question about women,” said Sandra T. Keating, a member of the Vatican’s Commission for Religious Relations with Muslims and associate professor of theology at Providence College, Rhode Island. 

While questions about women’s rights are “valid and important,” she said, “my own experience is that we have also often overlooked the interconnectedness and the way in which we see ourselves as part of a family, of a larger community. As my sister just said, we don’t think of ourselves as a gender, but more being recognized as a human being.”

A woman’s decision to cover her hair is a choice, “a religious expression of how we present our deepest beliefs to the public,” she said. “I think we should move away from this perception we have that somehow women are treated so badly. Not only in Islam, but as a Roman Catholic, I hear that very often.”

The women were speaking during a public dialogue at the culmination of the historic March 1-3 summit, which brought together  leaders from the Anglican, Roman Catholic, Shi’a and Sunni faith traditions. Several Jewish leaders also attended the summit as observers.

The clerics and scholars appealed to government and community leaders to promote peace and reconciliation efforts worldwide, and their statement is available here: http://www.nationalcathedral.org/pdfs/Summit2010_poa.pdf

An on-demand webcast of the dialogue is available here: http://www.nationalcathedral.org/events/summit20100303.shtml

Bhutto liked mini skirt

Former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto liked to wear mini skirt at home.

Mini skirts in the Middle East [1966-1975]

Hijabi poem

Halima Al Ahmed, Somalia

You see me as a one, who is trapped in darkness,
One who is held back in time,
One who is subjected to the ruling of men,
One who is a follower of a faith that oppresses her,
One who is veiled,
One who is tortured and disrespected all under the acceptance of her religion.
You see me as the illiterate woman who cannot know
Right from wrong
Left from right
Darkness from light
Happiness from sorrow!
you think my sense of dressing as a sign of obedience to men, out of fear for men
But do you know my hijab symbolizes my sincerity to my faith?
My love for my creator
My respect for the Mothers of the believers
The respect for my body
My need to be independent
My desire to be recognizes as a woman of intellect
Why did most of the respectable women in history cover?
Virgin Mary!
Mother Therese?
Play boy women seldom make history!
I am independent!
Islam is not a religion that traps or enslaves me but rather a religion that liberates me
Makes others view me as a woman and respect me.
Indeed, the status of women in Islam can never ever be equal to that of the western perception
The first person who accepted Islam was a woman
And the first martyr of Islam was a woman!
The Prophet peace be upon him said “paradise lies under the feet of your mother”
How can you possibly say Islam oppresses me?
Tortures me?
Abuses me?
Don’t you see sister for interviews you wear clothes that reveal your body, in order to be selected.
You sell your dignity in order to please the men,
Your self-esteem depends on the men who praise you, the more you show, the more you are showered with praises.
You are dependent on men!
You waste your soul and beauty,
You sell your dignity and respect,
You’re fooling yourself,
And you think I am slave to men?
If your definition of freedom is pleasing men and enslavement defines respecting oneself, then I chose the latter with pride!

Hijab Styles

 

YouTube Preview Image

 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up